Although this issue came to a head contemporaneously with the issues set out above in October 2023, in order not to further confuse the above-mentioned issues with yet another moving part, I will outline this issue here. Although this issue may, at first glance, appear to be an entirely separate issue to the above mentioned issues, I will show how they are connected.
In 2023, shortly after my uncle Billy Soorley's death, my 'friend' Ms Amy Bostock (also known online as Amulet ov Acorn) announced that she had finally done the paternity test of her daughter ‘O’, who was then over a year old and that it had indicated that the father was the father of my child, Alexander Jenner. Alexander Jenner agreed that he had seen the paternity test and that he was indeed the father.
Even though I did ask to see the paternity test, it never happened. There are a number of reasons for this including that Alexander Jenner had already informed our daughter ‘L’ that ‘O’ was her sister without consulting me, that I truly believed Amy Bostock to be a close friend and that I could not even imagine someone close to me lying about something so important, nor someone claiming to be the parent of a child when this was not the case. There was also a lot happening in our lives at the time.
Therefore, for approximately the last 10 years, everyone has proceeded on the basis that my daughter ‘L’ and ‘O’ were half-sisters. They became a part of each other's lives. Over time, this also resulted in all forms of support for my daughter, financial and otherwise eroding to almost nothing.
I accepted this for many reasons that can only be described as severe forms of fraud, misrepresentation and psychological abuse by both Alexander Jenner and Amy Bostock and also because I did not see that I had much of a choice.
Amy Bostock informed me that she and ‘O’ had an abundance of financial support from her family in terms of buying her a house, cars, steiner school fees etc. and ‘L’ and I had no other support whatsoever.
At times ‘L’ and I were without even housing and being forced to move (i.e trafficked) into dangerous areas and situations where we were both being groomed by other traffickers.
Both Alexander Jenner and Amy Bostock were well aware of our difficult financial situation.
The fact that I am now asking to see this DNA certificate is now being used to paint me as mentally ill and to further alienate my daughter from myself, in order to make us both easier to continue to traffic.
Alexander used his 'apparent' parentage of another child to reduce his financial support for his own daughter to all but a very nominal amount.
He is refusing to provide the DNA certificate, which he says exists, or any reason why he will not provide this information. (Attachment AHMJ1).
In an attempt to explain why Alexander may have agreed to say that the child ‘O’ was his daughter, when it seems that there is no evidence that this is the case, the following details are relevant:-
In 2012, approximately a year prior to the announcement that Alexander Jenner was ‘O's father, he sat me down and informed me in the presence of witnesses (ostensibly for my moral support) that he had been stalking me for approximately the 10 previous years since we had separated. He told me that he had come to my places of residence only multiple occasions and had filmed me naked without my knowledge. Even though he told me that he was regretful of his actions and had destroyed the footage of me, I do not believe him and would be surprised if it is not still in existence.
After this revelation, I instigated stronger boundaries between Alexander Jenner and myself and restricted communication with him to strictly parenting matters.
Despite these stronger boundaries, Alexander Jenner was again later caught stalking me by a friend. He admitted to this.
Alexander Jenner had a very unhealthy obsession with me and became very angry at me for putting stronger boundaries in place in our parenting relationship. He did not seem to be able to accept that our relationship was over.
Due to the above facts, it would not surprise me if Alexander Jenner claimed ‘O’ as his child partly in order to justify reducing his support of our daughter and thereby causing me pain and making my life very difficult. The fact that he would cause so much pain to both ‘L’ and ‘O’ in order to hurt me, I find very disturbing.
I have still not received any evidence that Alexander Jenner is the Father of ‘O’. I can see no reason for me not to be provided with this evidence, should it be in existence, given that it was the sole basis to justify the substantial diversion of financial and other support away from my daughter and towards Amy Bostock's daughter for over 10 years.
The situation at present is that a self-confessed sexual predator has claimed a young girl to be his daughter with absolutely no proof. Given that both Amy Bostock and Alexander Jenner continue to refuse to provide any evidence of their claim, I felt that the only option left to me in order to try to protect ‘O’ was to report the matter to Child Services (ref no. 15489558). I have not received any communication from Child Services about this matter.
I have grave concerns for the trauma that this lie may be causing to both my daughter and ‘O’. ‘O’ has the right to know who her father is and my daughter ‘L’ also deserves to know the truth of this matter. The deliberate alienation between my daughter and myself and lack of financial resources also leave my daughter open to be exploited by forces that she has no comprehension of.
Amy Bostock has informed me on a number of occasions during the time that I have known her that she was ‘in love’ with me. The last time that she informed me of this was in approximately June 2023. I didn’t take Amy Bostock’s confession of love very seriously (obviously not seriously enough) as she likes to have multiple partners, was in a serious long term partnership with a man at the time and is often ‘in love’ with different people from time to time. I am heterosexual and monogamous. I figured that we had very different definitions of the term ‘in love’. However, I now believe that Amy, like Alexander Jenner (as I discuss further below), also has a strange love/hate obsession with me that involves incredibly toxic envy that renders her capable of trying to destroy my life, partly because I have no interest in being in a ‘polyamorous’ relationship with her. I have reason to believe that members of my family helped her to view herself as something of a ‘handler’ of me – to keep tabs on me and sabotage me, all the while pretending to be my ‘friend’.
Amy Bostock insisted on sending me a copy of a book that she was reading, titled ‘How to create a mind-controlled slave”. Now, I can see that she was using a lot of those mind control techniques on me, with the help of my family, to tap into my deepest trauma. I have serious questions about this woman’s mental health and consider her to be incredibly dangerous due to the fact that her connections to my corrupt family mean that her actions are completely unchecked. Two different people, who previously considered themselves to be friends of Amy Bostock have specifically asked me to not involve them in this issue because they are scared of her and of the lengths that she would be willing to go in order to make their lives difficult if she knew that they were helping or supporting me in any way. This woman, like many others mentioned in this document, pretends to be a ‘fine upstanding member of the community’.
On 24 September 2023, in an attempt to try to get to the bottom of what was happening in my life, I emailed Amy Bostock requesting a copy of the DNA certificate which she said that she had taken of her child a decade earlier proving that the father of her daughter ‘O’ was indeed Alexander Jenner. Please find attached copies of the emails between Ms Amy Bostock and myself in relation to this matter Attachment P. The short version of these emails is that both Ms Bostock and Alexander Jenner are refusing to provide me with a copy of the DNA certificate which they say is in existence. The email exchange between Amy Bostock and myself in relation to this issue is very telling.
I believe that any reasonable person, on reading this email exchange would find it difficult not to conclude that Amy Bostock has been lying to everybody in her life about the paternity of her child for over 10 years.
Amy Bostock has also:-
Slandered me by stating to anyone who would listen that I have had a ‘psychotic break’ .
Actively taken actions to alienate me from my daughter.
Expressed absolute and completely unreasonable confidence that any Court would simply take her word for it that she has the DNA certificate which she claims to have without producing it and thereby allow a man who is a self-confessed sexual predator to claim to be the father of her young daughter with no evidence whatsoever.
This issue also illustrates a disturbing link between Amy Bostock and my aunt, Kerry Soorley.
I did not initially receive a reply to my email of 24 September 2023 to Amy Bostock requesting evidence of her child’s paternity. I did however have a telephone call with my daughter ‘L’ who informed me that both Kerry Soorley and Amy Bostock had been messaging her with 'concern' for my mental health. ‘L’ requested that I ask both Kerry Soorley and Amy Bostock to stop communicating with her about me as it was causing her distress. I had stopped communicating with both Kerry Soorley and Amy Bostock by telephone and text message. However, they were both still able to email me during this time. Therefore there was no need for either of them to be messaging my daughter with this 'concern'.
On 18 October 2023, in line with my daughter's request, I texted Kerry Soorley requesting that she stop messaging ‘L’ Attachment Q. Kerry Soorley replied to my text stating that she had messaged ‘L’ on 13 September 2023 and 18 October 2023. She also sent me another text message indicating that she was in communication with Amy Bostock in response to my enquiry about this issue.
Excerpt of Text Messages between Kerry Soorley and Myself 18 October 2023:-
Kerry Soorley:- "Yes, I am talking to Amulet as we have both been concerned as we both love you dearly".
Zephyr Jali:- "Would you please ask her to answer my email re: evidence of Al's paternity of ‘O’?"
Kerry Soorley:- "Got nothing to do with me my dear (prayer and heart emoji)".
These texts indicates that:-
That both Amy Bostock and Kerry Soorley were messaging and causing undue ‘concern’ to my daughter ‘L’ during the same period of time that Amy Bostock was ignoring my email of 24 September 2023, requesting evidence of her daughter ‘O's paternity. Why did Amy Bostock chose to slander my mental health to my own daughter rather than answering my email of 24 September 2023? Amy Bostock and ‘L’ have never been close despite Amy Bostock’s attempt to paint that picture.
That Kerry Soorley was also in communication with Amy Bostock during this 3-week period of time.
That Kerry's behaviour and communication during this time, as evidenced by these text messages and other emails are not consistent with someone who was genuinely seeking to communicate with me or was worried about me. If Kerry is indeed the ‘loving aunt’ that she pretends to be, why was she not concerned that Amy Bostock had no proof for her claims that Alexander Jenner was the father of her child when she was well aware that the consequence of these claims had left both ‘L’ and I (her supposedly beloved family members) in dire financial straits for many years?
In the many years that I have known both Kerry Soorley and Amy Bostock, neither has ever expressed much of an interest in communicating or spending time with the other, nor with ‘L’. As far as I was aware, they rarely if ever communicated with each other directly.
Kerry's behaviour in relation to Amy Bostock and the paternity of ‘O’ informs her behaviour in relation to her brother Billy's will. Evidence in relation to either one of the circumstances will necessarily affect her credibility in relation to the issue. Many of the questions and facts that have lead to this conclusion are raised in the unanswered email that I sent to Kerry Soorley dated 20 February 2023 (Attachment R).
Another link between Kerry Soorley and Amy Bostock is the Happy Herb Shop. Shortly after Amy’s announcement that Alex was the father of her daughter, Amy Bostock secured a sought-after position at the Happy Herb Shop in Nimin. Kerry Soorley is a very close personal friend of Ray Thorpe, the owner of the Happy Herb Shop franchise. She has often informed me that they speak on a daily basis. Also, in June 2023, Amy Bostock informed me that she was purchasing a house from the owner of the Happy Herb Shop in Port Douglas, Janja Peschel and her partner (a place where I had previously worked and been bullied by the owner).
It is also important to mention that at the time that Amy Bostock first made her claim, she was (or recently had been) homeless with a very young child. The link between Amy Bostock and Kerry Soorley raises serious questions about her working with my family to deliberately emotionally and financially abuse me for her own financial gain. This situation kept me in a state of ‘survival mode’ for a very long time and very much benefited Jim Soorley and Kerry Soorley in that it prevented me from being able to look into and challenge Billy’s will.
Amy Bostock has continued to refuse to provide an address for the service of legal documents. Attachment P.A. Like all other illegal actors in this story, she simply stopped communicating when it became clear that she has been caught in a massive, illegal and blatant lie. She is clearly very confident in her belief that she can rely on this group’s corrupt connections within the police services to not investigate this matter so that she will have to take accountability for her incredibly damaging and clearly criminal actions.