- Jul 10, 2025
8. A Tale of Two Lists: Epstein's List Vs The List of 28 Suspected Prominent Australian Paedophiles.
While Australians join in the loud worldwide condemnation
Of the lost Epstein client list,
It has been nearly ten years since,
in 2015, Senator Heffernan revealed that he had
A police list of 28 prominent Australians,
Who were suspected paedophiles,
And that one of these people
was even a former Prime Minister.
10 years later, this list has still not been investigated
(either at all, or properly investigated)
and has largely fallen from public attention.
These names were mentioned in the context of the Wood Royal Commission into Systemic Corruption in the New South Wales Police Service (1994 -1997) and then again in the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (2012-2017).
The disturbing statement "We have decided not to revisit that issue, because the public would lose confidence in the Judiciary" is attributed to Justice James Roland Wood, the Royal Commissioner during the Wood Royal Commission.
Senator Heffernan stated it well when he said “It’s not so much the secrets that’s the problem. It’s when a group such as the 28 people on this page, keep each other’s secrets.”
There has been talk about a suppression order in relation to these 28 prominent suspected paedophiles, but the truth is more diabolical than that. A suppression order is unnecessary in a system that is totally aligned with the well-being of the pedophile network. All that needs to happen for these names and crimes to be effectively suppressed, is nothing at all.
The paedophiles, police and politicians rely on people’s inability to see the extent to which the deliberate inaction of public servants is weaponised against the people they are meant to serve and in favour of the ‘prominent paedophiles’ and the people that support them. It is simply business as usual.
These 'public servants' rely on people’s inability to compute that that EVERYONE in these systems is going along with this inaction.
Surely if there was something to these allegations, they would be investigated and prosecuted. Right? Therefore, there mustn’t be anything to it.
How is it possible that in 2022, the Australian Government did not prosecute a single human trafficker, despite the fact that it is the fastest growing criminal enterprise, second only to the drug trade in revenue? Sure these people must be very hard to find right? Actually, they aren’t. They are very easy to find. The 'authorities' just don’t want to.
It is much easier (and definitely safer) to point at the paedophiles and human traffickers, who are all the away over there. The ones that may not look like us or that we are powerless to do anything about.
The lack of any action, or even much talk about, this list of prominent Australian Paedophiles, which has never even been investigated with the full permission of the Australian people, as evidenced by the subsequent elections where it wasn’t even mentioned, shows the truth of the matter:
Paedophiles are part of the most protected class of people in Australia, a class which also includes Human Traffickers.
And people expose this powerful, systemically integrated network at their peril.
Sure, they throw some low-hanging fruit out to dry occasionally, to maintain the illusion of being tough on this crime.
But the idea that anyone within the political, legal and law enforcement systems is actually addressing the powerful networks of pedophiles and human traffickers who control this country, is a fantasy.
Although paedophilia is technically against the law on paper, in reality, the mere asking of reasonable questions about the paedophiles who are part of this network is much more likely to see someone black-listed, accused of making false allegations, disappeared, charged, labelled mentally ill & targeted by human traffickers than anything happening to the perpetrators and those that protect them.
If a former Prime Minister can be named in an official police document as a suspected paedophile (along with the other 28 suspected prominent Australians paedophiles) without it having been investigated 10 years later, why would anyone who continues to vote for politicians who aren’t even talking about this local state of affairs, care about Epstein’s client list?
References:
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/
https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2020-11-10.31.2
https://www.brighteon.com/82834eef-0a1f-445b-9d99-27778821c9b9
https://open.spotify.com/episode/2xgCjgKgNH72B4vhPBq4R7?si=qMeRxAlNQeWPYF-BBUGXXw